OK, so i've managed to try the Touring Pipe on two different setups now, and here are the results so far:
First we had Celts GP200 in, its a cast iron piston port, i didnt get into his engine so i dont know what the exact cylinder spec is, but from what he's told me, i believe its Stage 4/5 tune. I dont have my other notes in front of me right now, so Celt can correct me if i'm wrong, but i believe it was running a KRP2 pipe and 30mm Delly.
So we ran it up on the dyno to get a base reading, and i've got to say....in standard trim, the results were pretty good:17.5 bhp and 12.8ft-lbs (blue lines). Then we tried the Adspeed pipe and it did what he said it would do.....it bumped up the torque and stuffed it lower down the rev range, although it did knock a couple of bhp of peak power and altered the delivery curve somewhat: 15.4 bhp and 15 ft-lbs (red lines). I've got to say, with regard to this alteration of power delivery, i prefered the original (blue lines) for my style of riding, and didnt like the way the bhp dropped and flattened off after peak power was made.....the power curve looks weird to me, but someone wishing to 'de-rev' and up-gear may like it.
Below: Comparison of both pipes, bhp & ft-lbs
Below: just the bhp comparison (KRP2 17.5 vs Ads 15.4)
Below: Just the ft-lbs comparison (KRP2 12.8 vs Ads 15)
Image of actual pipes:
So having done that test, we then got a TS1 through the door, standard trim, 35mmTMX carb, JL3 pipe......and the results were much better. This is what i consider to be the 'it does what it says on the tin' graph!

By that, i mean that Ads said that on a 'fruity' machine (say a TS1 or RB etc) where somemone wants to keep peak BHP, increase ft-lbs, bring both peaks lower down the rev range and up gear......this is the best application for this exhaust. Original trim it was 20 bhp & 15.6 ft-lbs (blue lines) but with the Adspeed pipe it was 20bhp & 16.83 ft-lbs. The difference being this time, that peak bhp held, ft-lbs increased, but more importantly the shape of the graph improved. Both bhp & ft-lbs were delivered earlier, and both managed to hang on in a very similar manner to the JL3. So TS1225, JL3 vs Adspeed:
Below: Comparison of both pipes, BHP & ft-lbs
Below: Just BHP comparisons (JL3 20 vs Ads 20)
Below: Just ft-lbs comparisons: (JL3 15.6 vs Ads 16.8)
So all in all, from this fairly limited test i've done, i'd say that a machine in a low state of tune will not benefit from this pipe nearly as much as a cylinder which is in a higher state of tune. And if you have such an engine and your goal is to re-gear for a more touring type of ride rather than a revvy-racer type of ride, this pipe should certainly be considered. Its a bit cheaper than a JL3 and seems to give better touring capabilities on tuned engines.
Also....from an aesthetics perspective, it looks good, it also sound fit when it revs up, the rear can bracket/support is good quality, and i did notice that it seemed to run cooler than the JL or KRP....by that i mean it was litterally cooler to the touch, after dynoing i could whip the Adspeed pipe off fairly quickly, but had a to wait a while for the other two to cool down. I also noted that the Adspeed pipe leaned up both engines and so to get out on the road with these pipes you would want to richen up the jetting.
If i get chance to try any other different engines before Ads comes to pick the pipe back up, then i will do so, and i believe he is also dropping off the new 'road/race' version for me to try too.....which im keen to compare on both a standard TS1 and my group 6 TS1 also!!
