long range tank fitting problem...

Anything related to Lambrettas... ask tech questions, post helpful info, or just read and learn.
sydduckett
registered user
Posts: 1900
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:21 am
Contact:

nelson pk wrote:I agree with corrado. Most people want a bigger tank but want to keep the toolbox. There should be more mid range ones available.
There seems to be a good market for these.
But there is one, the Stainless Steel Products one. Its a quality bit of kit and comes with cut outs if your running a kit. for my money they stack up against the Diablo ones. I do agree he is missing a trick though by not making a 13 litre one.

This point has been mentioned to him before but i guess he has his reasons for not making them.
storkfoot
registered user
Posts: 1154
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:08 am
Main scooter: '70 GP150 [TS1 225]
Location: Merseyside
Contact:

I've got one of Al's tanks with a cutout at the front for tools or a battery. OK, it's not as big as a toolbox but I can get a fistful of basic tools and a 250ml oil pot in. Job's a goodun :D
User avatar
corrado
Dealer
Posts: 2588
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:12 am
Main scooter: Lambretta GP
Location: Top of Blackpool Tower
Contact:

sydduckett wrote:
nelson pk wrote:I agree with corrado. Most people want a bigger tank but want to keep the toolbox. There should be more mid range ones available.
There seems to be a good market for these.
But there is one, the Stainless Steel Products one. Its a quality bit of kit and comes with cut outs if your running a kit. for my money they stack up against the Diablo ones. I do agree he is missing a trick though by not making a 13 litre one.

This point has been mentioned to him before but i guess he has his reasons for not making them.
SSP stuff looks good quality but most people don't trust stainless steel or like me who don't like anything shiney that doesn't need to be.
WINTERMODEL150
registered user
Posts: 436
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 5:31 pm
Main scooter: lambretta ld auto
Contact:

corrado wrote:
sydduckett wrote:
nelson pk wrote:I agree with corrado. Most people want a bigger tank but want to keep the toolbox. There should be more mid range ones available.
There seems to be a good market for these.
But there is one, the Stainless Steel Products one. Its a quality bit of kit and comes with cut outs if your running a kit. for my money they stack up against the Diablo ones. I do agree he is missing a trick though by not making a 13 litre one.

This point has been mentioned to him before but i guess he has his reasons for not making them.
SSP stuff looks good quality but most people don't trust stainless steel or like me who don't like anything shiney that doesn't need to be.
Fitted a tank mentioned on hear some time ago it leaked from day one, sent it back had it re welded all ok for a while and guess what ?yes it leaked again :wtf:

Remember people all that glitters is not gold ,making my own now :D

Dean
storkfoot
registered user
Posts: 1154
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:08 am
Main scooter: '70 GP150 [TS1 225]
Location: Merseyside
Contact:

From my limited (very) knowledge of metallurgy, I'd always go with a mild steel tank. I've seen too many posts on scooter forums over the years of s/steel cracking to even think about putting petrol in a stainless steel tank.

I've seen one of Velocity Scooters' aluminium tanks close up and the welding looks very neat. Is aluminium a better option than stainless steel for shiney lovers??
Bufficus
registered user
Posts: 271
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 1:38 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex
Contact:

storkfoot wrote:
I've seen one of Velocity Scooters' aluminium tanks close up and the welding looks very neat. Is aluminium a better option than stainless steel for shiney lovers??
Not in my experience. Aluminium is also liable to crack/split on the seems. Possibly depends on the gauge. Mild steel for me.
gaz_powell
registered user
Posts: 1208
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:10 pm
Location: hartlepool
Contact:

i recently fitted one of the Saigon Scooter Centre tanks - no major problems

Placed it without rubbers for a dry run to see what the clearance was like - could see it was going to be tight at the tap so I reduced the thickness of the back outrigger rubbers and the ones on the tank seam to allow the tank to fit a bit further back - job done
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic
  • Information
  • Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 10 guests