scooterslag wrote:More piccies please- really like thatJ1MS wrote:
Think you just clicked on the wrong code.
Think it should be the fourth line of text.
I'll try and master the photobucket thingy thursday night.
scooterslag wrote:More piccies please- really like thatJ1MS wrote:
Think you just clicked on the wrong code.
Think it should be the fourth line of text.
smiffy1968 wrote:Bugger, Ricspeed. You have picked out the one bone of contention i have with it. It was not quite a right fit, as you said about the rake, if i had gotten the front frame section straight with the lammy tube the bloody forks would have been too upright. I also see it as a potential weak point, thats why i welded in a large chunk of 6mm flat plate up the inside. This bike is pretty rough close up, but thats what i intended anyway.
Madness, i would love to see the chop you have built similar to this, as i have not clapped eyes on a hardtail. I am beginning to think i am missing a point here. I have built the rear strut replacing the shock with large rubberized bushes hoping this will take any shock out. Although talking to a mate tonight, we were chatting about a trick harley shock that works on extension not compression. Thinking about fitting it horizontally under frame tube the grafting some kind of bracket of the engine..............zzzzzzzzzzzz.......
Yes well said me 2 im more into the early 80s chop cutdown scootersschniedel wrote:the black one looks bloody nice.each to there own,but im more a traditional chopper fan and love the old styles.
i think the m/cycle forks are a hugh improvment in handling and breaking,but i think they always look to fat and bulky...
smiffy1968 wrote:That suspension set up looks very smart, i cannot imagine how brilliant the back end will look. What engine is this and is this yours? Looks mega!
RICSPEED wrote:smiffy1968 wrote:That suspension set up looks very smart, i cannot imagine how brilliant the back end will look. What engine is this and is this yours? Looks mega!![]()