I'd been away from the scene for nearly 20 years and was surprised how little things had changed.Matty wrote:Example: Feature on RS Tuning in a 1993 edition of Scootering.
Look at the spec of the RS250, that'd be wild these days let alone in 1993. Considering this was a road scooter and built by Ralph I'd wager that it was reliable too. Also, look at the clutch and the gearing, how did a spec like that run on a 4 plate clutch when so many people jump straight onto 5 and 6 plate clutch these days? Have Lambretta tuners really advanced any further over the years or are they just redoing the same ideas over and over again bearing in mind that the TS1 had already been out a few years at this point.
Things that I assumed would have been commercially available were:
1. 5-speed gearbox - this would have transformed the usability of tuned scooters and allowed an even higher state of tune
2. Kit cylinders with significantly more finned area (and matching cowls) - more power = more heat
3. Kit cylinders with power values - I know studs make it hard, but there is a way.......
4. Quieter expansion chambers - why do they need to be so bloody loud? (they don't)
5. Knock sensors - let the engine sense how much advance it can take
6. Bolt-on autolube
7. Any sort of aero advantage - screen/mudguard/under-tray etc
8. Cylinder head/combustion chamber design
9. Still stuck with that stupid inlet port location
10. No sign of a proper plenum-type airbox
11. Rear damper options
However I think we've moved forward on:
1. Dynos for development work
2. Use of EGT's/CHT's
3. Front brake options
4. Front damper options
5. Affordable ignition retarders
6. Choice of cylinders kits
7. Clutch options
8. Composite bodywork (except where the subframe weighs more than the original)
Just my view - feel free to disagree........... Understandably, more and more people are simply transplanting engines.