Page 1 of 1

100/90-10 Front and Rear

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 4:35 pm
by Dimitrios_231
Should I better use a 3.50-10 front tyre with a 100/90-10 rear?

I'm asking because I want to put the ML 50 Bridgestone,
I can only use the 100/90-10 type,
as no 3.50-10 size is available.

What are the pros and cons of using a 100/90-10 tyre at both wheels?

Re: 100/90-10 Front and Rear

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 11:42 pm
by rog60
Used 110/90 x 10 on my scoot( Continental Zippy 1) a couple of years ago. Overall feel was much improved stability at the front and roadholding on corners............

No downside except cost :!: :!: :!: :!:

Hope that helps.........

Re: 100/90-10 Front and Rear

Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:27 am
by Andy Pickering
Been using front and back 100s all year and very impressed indeed..was always an S1 man before but not now (schwalbe racemans) spot on.. ;)
BUT I need to get the washers to space the rear as after stripping noticed faint black rubber line down inside of engine case.. :shock: ..so MB cone and washer spacers for me.. 8-)

Re: 100/90-10 Front and Rear

Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:07 am
by soulsurfer
I used 100/90 weatherman front and rear and they felt very stable. Aparently a smaller front tyre improves handling so I have a 90/90 to try, any thoughts?

Re: 100/90-10 Front and Rear

Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:07 am
by chris2470
If you look at most race bikes they will use a thinner front tyre than rear as it tips in quicker. Thus 3.50 front and 100/90 rear would be good trade off.

Re: 100/90-10 Front and Rear

Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:10 am
by Dimitrios_231
Thanks for the input,

I have used in the past,
a front 90/90-10 Heidenau K58 and it had great feeling,
I was using a 3.50-10 Michelin SM 100 at the rear.

The front end was lowered and it was giving a racing (well you know) feeling.
Problem was that I always had mechanical failures that period ,
so when I fixed the engine I also changed the tyres,
never again tried that combo,
but I believe it worths a try.

Re: 100/90-10 Front and Rear

Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:26 pm
by Mag
I use raceman 350/10 front and 100/90/10 rear on my TS and 100/90 s both ends on my stage4. I immediatly felt the difference with th fatter tyre on the back of both, but I am hard pressed to tell any difference between the two front ends on the road.
Having said that if you compare a Schwalbe 350/10 profile with an S1 then the S1 looks realy skinny or is it the Schwalbe that looks fat?

Re: 100/90-10 Front and Rear

Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:58 pm
by doggbhoy
Lam46 wrote:Been using front and back 100s all year and very impressed indeed..was always an S1 man before but not now (schwalbe racemans) spot on.. ;)
BUT I need to get the washers to space the rear as after stripping noticed faint black rubber line down inside of engine case.. :shock: ..so MB cone and washer spacers for me.. 8-)
i did this last year, after i noticed mark on case i took it off and put the 3.5 back on would fitting a bigger cone or putting washer spacers under wheel not put it all out? :?

Re: 100/90-10 Front and Rear

Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 6:21 pm
by rbgaz
soulsurfer wrote:I used 100/90 weatherman front and rear and they felt very stable. Aparently a smaller front tyre improves handling so I have a 90/90 to try, any thoughts?
same here no rubbing issues either

Re: 100/90-10 Front and Rear

Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 1:50 pm
by GP Kevo
I've run 3.50 x 10 on the front and 100/90/10 on the rear for years. Better roadholding and it looks nice. MBD now's selling a thicker rear hub washer for wider tyres to make installing them easier. I've a set of Heidenau K-61's (3.50x10 and 100/90/10) to go on my GP230 TS1 as soon as I wear out the S1's that are on it.