Page 1 of 3

look nice, but engines prob be wank

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 6:35 pm
by rbgaz

Re: look nice, but engines prob be wank

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 6:51 pm
by wack 63
Shame the headlight won't fit a GP :cry:

Re: look nice, but engines prob be wank

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 7:09 pm
by Muttley McLadd
It looks a lot nicer than most Lambretta replicas.

Still a filthy auto, by the look of it.

Re: look nice, but engines prob be wank

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 7:51 pm
by RICSPEED
wack 63 wrote:Shame the headlight won't fit a GP :cry:
im sure it wouldnt

Re: look nice, but engines prob be wank

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 9:43 pm
by sparklymarkly
Love the descriptions:
"The overall design will make you impressed".
"TL is the newest designed classic scooter which has the brilliant painting matched with simple stickers."
"The seat is made by elastic PU and cover is pressed with delicate lines."

How could you not be impressed by a seat that's pressed with delicate lines and some stickers?! :roll:

I must say it does look a hell of a lot better than an LN though.
I'll get my coat......

Re: look nice, but engines prob be wank

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 9:50 pm
by ricalnic

Re: look nice, but engines prob be wank

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 10:01 pm
by a.lo.v2
looking at the specifications engine displacement(cc) 820, now that would be interesting!!!!!!

Re: look nice, but engines prob be wank

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 10:06 pm
by ArmandTanzarian
But does it actually exist or is it just another chinese photoshop job like so many previous lookey likeys

Re: look nice, but engines prob be wank

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 10:10 pm
by Shaunbond

Re: look nice, but engines prob be wank

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 10:14 pm
by ArmandTanzarian
Shaunbond wrote:
That's the one.
Does this mean that the Frank Sanderson etc have done all of the design and R&D, gone off to China to get them made and the company has just taken their designs and started making them for themselves?