sydduckett wrote:Dryballs if the site wasnt so poor i would have done that, but i have better things to do with my time. Its his company hes trying to defend, not to much to expext him to post a link , after all he does keep reffering to it. But as your on a retainer i can see that you have done it for him...

lol.
I appreciate that link but wished it was more visible when my partner bought be me these (got to be over 2yrs now) after a partial refund offered by Scootrs from the safety bead issue of the V1, a) she didn't see that caveat or anything else (it went something like "what do you want for xmas... some stainless tubeless ((safer)) wheel from Scootrs) I dont think many people tend to have to look at small print to buy a damn wheel!
b) I wouldnt have found it as the only things I can find easy on the site are things to buy or which are promoted.
If something is
"show use only" its not road use too, it's a contradictory statement. At the time these were purchased there wasnt a debate about stainless cracking, sure meturallugists would know and so would perhaps mechanics, but who else????
it is only when they arrived was "show use" seen, as you can imagine, the cost to sent these back from the uk would have been costly again well before Sticky's and others debate started on LCGB.
I do believe Randall on inferior grades and that he has done his best - but I also can see the logic on Stainless cracking. It's just that SS tubeless and V1 have now cost me a lot and obviously I am now very p**ed off that i have to buy yet another set to be "safer".