Thanks, sounds easy enough to give me a rough idea as to whether I need to do any work. Hopefully will find time over the next few days to give it a go. Ideally they will be ok anyway and I can leave alone - I'll check out how rough the edges are too.olliewtf wrote:
to creat a port map, you are essentially measuring the distance between the top of your barrel, to the top of the exhaust and transfers, and the bottom of the inlet. The best way is to insert a roll of card/paper, and shade over the ports. the edges of the ports will show up, allowing you to measure down. The shape and width and area also comes into play, but maybe thats for another day. Use Eden's fantastic online calculator at lambretta images archive (google it) and put in all your figures to work out the timings.
I'm interested in your comment regarding con rod length as I'm planning on replacing this item, and Ive read before that a longer con rod gives a smoother engine but I'm not quite sure what people mean by this and what the advantage is. Do you mean the power is more evenly distributed over the rev range? Changing to a longer rod does not give more power does it. The opposite would be a engine that delivers power more in certain rev ranges than others? This might be ok depending on driving style or environment ? I tend to drive in urban areas and rag the arse off it if possible. Its kind of fun.
Also I don't think I will be changing to another kit if this one does not work out that well. No money for that! Also I'm sure if I keep to my objectives it will be fine. The increase from 150 to 175 in itself should give me a nice difference in engine I'm thinking. At the end of the day reliability is more important to me than power which is why the small improvement to a safe 175 appeals.



