Page 2 of 2
Re: 230 or 240?
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 9:20 am
by lockman69
Mel K wrote:I am going from 230 back to 225, the 230 was nothing but trouble,

What sort of trouble? and what crank where you using?
Cheers
Re: 230 or 240?
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 9:21 am
by lockman69
sean brady scooters wrote:then why not just tune your ts1 225.........?
i dont know obviosly as yet your spec/set up ......but if its pretty normal .......then there are great gains to be had ............

Sean can you tune a TS1 barrel with out having to have it replated?
cheers
Re: 230 or 240?
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:55 am
by GP Kevo
I've a TS1 230, MB RaceTour tune, 71 mm x 58 mm. This is due to repair, rebore and replating. A few mm of displacement can help some, but it's the tuning to the barrel that will bring more power.
A long stroke crank should produce more torque at the expense of vibration.
Re: 230 or 240?
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:57 am
by Fruitjuice
If you do decide to go for longstroke, buy one with a long rod as well and get another piston, it'll vibrate a lot less and make it more enjoyable to drive.
Re: 230 or 240?
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:04 pm
by J1MS
Ive ported a few New TS1's, Normally widening the Exhaust port to between 62-65% without damage to the remaining Nikasil Liner, and squaring up the transfers in the bore But they really shouldn't just be cut with a Tungsten Burr then left as the piston and rings Will quite often pick up on the remaining sharp edges...
I Port to within 0.5mm then finish with more forgiving grinding tools. Then coarse 80-120 and gradually smoother flap wheels, then very fine mini flap wheels 320 grit which give a smooth finish to the port edges, these can be bought in sizes down to 10mm width and usually up to 25mm in varying grades from 60-320 grit...
But its probably better if you can do the porting first, then re-plate...
Re: 230 or 240?
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:16 pm
by Avantone
J1MS wrote:Ive ported a few New TS1's, Normally widening the Exhaust port to between 62-65% without damage to the remaining Nikasil Liner, and squaring up the transfers in the bore But they really shouldn't just be cut with a Tungsten Burr then left as the piston and rings Will quite often pick up on the remaining sharp edges...
I Port to within 0.5mm then finish with more forgiving grinding tools. Then coarse 80-120 and gradually smoother flap wheels, then very fine mini flap wheels 320 grit which give a smooth finish to the port edges, these can be bought in sizes down to 10mm width and usually up to 25mm in varying grades from 60-320 grit...
But its probably better if you can do the porting first, then re-plate...
Yeah, I was under the impression that the Nikasil coating wrapped round the edges of the port windows a few mm into the ports, and that opening the ports up without re-lining
could effect the wear resistance of the Nikasil where the rings run over the cut edge.
Re: 230 or 240?
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:33 pm
by Knowledge
tony wrote:30 hp out of a ts1 martin? Or an rb?
TS1.
Interestingly, I spoke with Staurt Owen at IoW and he said that since the TS1 became available again, he's only done a couple of RB's, but he has done lots of TS1's.
Re: 230 or 240?
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:39 pm
by Dryballs
GP Kevo wrote:A long stroke crank should produce more torque at the expense of vibration.
Not necessarily... I've run a TS1 230 for a couple of years now and the engine is super smooth!
It's an AF 60mm crank used with an MB piston.
Previously I used to use a Rapido 225 top end. With the standard ASSO piston it was fairly slow and lumpy, but when I changed to an MB forged piston (which was much lighter) the engine was transformed! It seemed more powerful... but became much much smoother