Page 2 of 2
Re: Mugello 225 vs RT225
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 2:49 pm
by Lambretta Sash
"On my low out put dyno" which i have put graphs up in dyno page i did manage good hp with 58mm x 110 crank and no reed valve with only a tickle on gremlins in ports
its not just the cylinder that makes the engine run efficiently its the whole build and selection of parts.
I quite like the muggello v4 and there better out if box
All of them need a fettle and work to get what you want from engine
Re: Mugello 225 vs RT225
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:17 pm
by Timbo
I have a 200 Mugello and a MB BGM standard RT225 kit. The MB kit is far superior and great for touring and IMHO exceptional quality. From what I've read it can be easily improved.
Re: Mugello 225 vs RT225
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:24 pm
by Noplastic
Here's my Mugello 225, maybe some of you can tell me which version it is: the inlet and the little chrome part missing
https://imageshack.com/i/ex7ee0f7j
https://imageshack.com/i/iqd0241bj
Re: Mugello 225 vs RT225
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 7:59 pm
by CPH Lambretta
Its the latest V4 version
Re: Mugello 225 vs RT225
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 8:33 pm
by chris2470
Why not a GT200, if I was on the market I'd seriously consider it, lots of room to grow also.
http://www.granturismo.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
Re: Mugello 225 vs RT225
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 1:33 am
by undeadned
I have a PX200, Where can I get this Kit from, I want to bore it as big as possible, what do you think the max is?
Re: Mugello 225 vs RT225
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 6:37 am
by Noplastic
undeadned wrote:I have a PX200, Where can I get this Kit from, I want to bore it as big as possible, what do you think the max is?
i think you're posting in the wrong section..
