Page 2 of 8
Re: 36 BHP rusty nail.
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:51 pm
by Dell Oughta
love it
Re: 36 BHP rusty nail.
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:24 pm
by Dryballs
Re: 36 BHP rusty nail.
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:36 pm
by wax
Hay, thanks dry balls. You the man, man!
Re: 36 BHP rusty nail.
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:26 pm
by maxi
The flying shed love it !!
Re: 36 BHP rusty nail.
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:34 pm
by wax
I might adopt that name for it. Good one Maxi.
Re: 36 BHP rusty nail.
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:44 pm
by high plains.......
thats ----ing great that is, i like it
Re: 36 BHP rusty nail.
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:52 pm
by Knowledge
I know even John was surprised by the performance he got out of this engine. 36bhp is a lot, especially when you consider that JB's dyno usually returns the lowest numbers when compared to Dynojet Dynos. Much of the improvement (over the 30bhp JB can obtain without welding) is down to the work that Jerome started on the base of the transfers, but I know JB spend some of his 7 hours making the most of this. The torque is perhaps more eye popping than the bhp.
I like the SII. Over taking cars at 80+mph must be fun, but not as much fun as catching motorcycles on back roads. Tee hee.
Re: 36 BHP rusty nail.
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:07 pm
by Bilko
Love it.
Re: 36 BHP rusty nail.
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:18 pm
by CT.
Do not restore (yet) and enjoy, this is brilliant.
Re: 36 BHP rusty nail.
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:37 pm
by byron
wax wrote:..Personally, I think it would lose its character ...
nail, head
my kind of ride.
