He sent me this e-mail
I remember the engine, but have not seen it since it left the shop.
The only problem it had was the mag gasket leaked, so you may want to look at that.
As I've said Im only rebuilding top ends using my 64mm cranks so people don't make a mess of it and instantly blame the most expensive part and me.
There will be no difference between 64 and 64.9mm strokes!
I've done a lot of research over Christmas to do another similar conversion, the KDX 200 air cooled looked good with a power valve! But this led to problems over running the power valve, which we can control with our new ignition system and a servo!
Any way, our crank should do the conversion and doubt if you will have a problem, but our cranks run a 22mm pin, ideally it should be 24-25mm but this leads to even more problems.
From memory the transfer timings are very low but the exhaust port is quiet big, so you could weld the exhaust port up and lower the timings.
I have on stock a 76mm piston already.
We can bore it out and replate or resleeve it, depending on what year cylinder it is.
Does this help any more?
Cheers Mark
On 2 Jan 2010, at 09:25, graham jones wrote:
> From:
[email protected]
> To:
[email protected]
> Subject: Re: Contact from
www.lambrettaspares.com
> Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:06:34 +0000
>
> Hi
>
> Questions on forums make me laugh!
>
> Why is a 65mm crank so important?
>
> We do an off the shelf 64mm stroke Race-Tour crank which can be
> assembled to suit the rod you ask, which from memory of doing race
> tuning KTM cart engines is the same rod!
>
> BUT because these are not simple off the shelf cranks, I will only fit
> them into engine casings and assemble the top end, this way I only get
> slagged off if I do it wrong!
>
> Cranks are usually around £525 but this rod cost more so maybe £600
> not what the forums say £1200!
>
> Cheers Mark
>
>
>
> On 31 Dec 2009, at 17:39, graham jones wrote:
>
> > MRB0688K
>
well i got my hands on one of your old air cooled kx 250 cylinder conversions quite a few
years ago.its a bit tired now so i thought i would spend some of my hard ernd upgrading.
i got another cylinder .untouched and thought it would be good to try and run it with the original stroke for the cylinder which as im sure you know was 64.9mm.i am well aware this would bee unproven in the lammy casing and could well end in tears.such is life.i know i would probably be better off investing in a dac but that would be a waste of a realy nice bit of engineering from yourself. plan is to use a 76mm kawasaki jet ski piston. js 300. and add some ali to the top off the cylinder to bring the port timings in line with the use of the four speed box. now dose that make any scence as to why a 65mm crank is important.now are you interested in helping me.and can we do business
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New! Receive and respond to mail from other email accounts from within Hotmail Find out how.