
With a new torque arm mount in front of the fork leg. I'll probably take the cable tie off, just before anyone says anything...
I suggest you take the parallelogram as a very rough starting point only. You need to try it and see. You'll end up higher. (Look at Frank's photo, for example.) Too low, no damping; too high you get diving.Knowledge wrote:I'm having a bit of a crisis of confidence about my anti-dive. I've followed my own rules (actually, it was Rob at JB's "rule") of using a parallelagram, but some how it just looks like the parallelagram will squash-up under braking, and the torque arm between the caliper and the forks will not resist the rotation of the fork link about it's own (front) pivot.
What do you think?
If were talking about the mounting point on the fork leg. isn't it too high, no damping, too low, you get divescootRS.com wrote:Too low, no damping; too high you get diving.
Knowledge wrote:....or would this be better?
With a new torque arm mount in front of the fork leg. I'll probably take the cable tie off, just before anyone says anything...

The caliper itself is very long. Note the top bolt for the caliper is at the top of the bracket.scootRS.com wrote: Why is your caliper bracket so long, btw? Why not end it after the caliper?

I have a set up looking like C Edmonds have (i think)...bitubos without springs, but new fluids and NO2 pressure done to match the internal fork progressive springs.simon k wrote:anyone tried the set up Charlie Edmunds runs on his race scoot? bitubo's with the spring removed and what looks like nolethane bushes
