Here we go again From old site
The problem is how do we measure the case volume here, this is where the problems start. Because in essence there are 2 crankcase volumes to take effect of the gas flow.
CVt Crankcase Volume at TDC: this is taken into account for Inlet Dynamics & the transfers volumes Vt but doesnt include the Inlet volume Vi.
CVb Crankcase Volume at BDC : This is taken into account for the Transfer Dynamics & includes the Inlet volume Vi but not the transfers volumes Vt.
So basically we are looking at the Inlet Dynamics and Transfer Dynamics
of crankcase compression.
So what we are looking at here for the Crankcase volume Cv is:
Cv = CVb+Sv+Vt (Sv is swept volume)
Or
Cv = CVt+Vi.
Now lets translate this into Compression Ratio using the new above Crankcase volume calcs.
PCr = Case volume at TDC CVt + Inlet volume Vi/ Case volume at TDC CVt+ Inlet volume Vi –Swept volume Sv
The best way to work out all these volumes is by using an old piston & puting a hole in the top & measure with a burette & liquid with the need for transfers & inlet to be accounted for.
There is some of the theory above
So what about practice, well as we are aware there are two schools of thought?
The use of high Primary compression ratios or low Primary compression ratio.
It use to be practice to reduce crankcase volume for high speed motors to produce high Primary compression ratio’s but now the opposite is being used.
The figure now being used is 1.5, which is deemed to be more then sufficient for high speed engines. This also being because the case volume changes the natural Helmholtz frequency of the Inlet and Transfer cycles and the CVt is used in the formula
The above formula as you can see takes into account the Inlet volume which when you look at the differences between a Piston Ported Barrel inlet track, & that of a TS,RB reed inlet track you may now see how this has a dramatic effect on Primary compression ratio.
Let’s now take 2 kits the Rapido Piston port & the TS1 reed valve (Not actual Figures)
Rapido 225 with standard crank no padding could give say PCr of say 1.55
You now put a full circle padded crank this could then increase PCr say to 1.6
Now let’s take TS1 with standard crank no padding could give say PCr of say 1.4
You now put a full circle padded crank this could then increase PCr say to 1.45
Why do think these sort of figure will come about i.e. TS1 having a smaller PCr then Rapido well think how much volume there is between the two inlets.
The TS1 Reed cage inlet has a much bigger volume.
What I’m trying to show here is, it again down to application what is fit for one engine may not be good for another
Hope I’ve explained myself here
Smiffy