RB20 (200cc) - Pictures and Spec

Anything related to Lambrettas... ask tech questions, post helpful info, or just read and learn.
User avatar
drunkmunkey6969
Moderator
Posts: 2838
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:42 pm
Main scooter: '69 Lambretta GP
Location: North Yorkshire
Contact:

Well.....what a little beauty this is! Had a really good look at it tonight, and its certainly a nice bit of kit.....there are some 'quirky' bits n bobs in regard to the cyllinder port layout/specs and other stuff.....but they are very interesting quirks indeed. I suspect they will become a point of speculation amongst the internet community, and add to the raging debate that is.....the RB phenomona! :lol:

So lets have a look at the kit then...and bear in mind, everything we (Sean and i) look at is from a tuning/racing perspective, so those concerned with touring may have a different angle on certain elements of the kit.

We intend to build up a nice little engine, that i will play with on the track.....in a similar fashion to my TS1, we will run a fast road tune...nothing groundbreaking, or maxed out....just a nice little toy...and a fast one! ;)

Full kit with, expansion chamber and crank
Image

A few bits i've cobbled together for the build....Li150 box, 16/47 sprockets, 6 plate clutch, rev counter, 34mm Delly (although may try a 35mm Mikuni) re-worked BGM stator, new seals, bearings, gaskets etc..
Image

This is the crank that goes with the kit....58mm crank, 116mm rod, AF 'RB spec' race crank with uprated bearing etc
Image

Cylinder head that comes with the kit
Image



So the cylinder itself..........what about the port layout? Well lets take a look......
Image

Now then....what do you make of that? Looks like a triple boost port, single exhaust, normal transfers right? Or is it.......? It also looks like the triple boost port is out of line/symetry with both the transfers and the exhaust port??? Or are they?

On closer inspection, it becomes apparent that the 3rd boost port (the slimmer of the 3) is actually an additional transfer port of sorts??!! :o And that the secondary transfers are not the same size. The side that is closest to the 3rd boost port/transfer, is smaller than the equivalent transfer on the opposite side of the cylinder, so we presume that the 3rd boost/transfer port makes up for that in some way.....although the area of that port, combined with the smaller transfer, then become different to the transfer port area on the opposite side....but the 3rd port will flow in a different way to a standard trans, due to the way its fed.

You can see a bit clearer from the underside of the cylinder
Image

And even better with a close up
Image

What you can see much better in the close up picture above, is that the 3rd slim boost port/transfer doesn't enter the cylinder on the same angle as the two main boost ports....they are angled up (schneurle loop etc) and the main transfers are more flat on entry....as is the 3rd boost port/transfer. So the entry angle of the 3rd port is at the same angle as the transfers, but the two boost ports are angled up. Of course the fuel mix that is fed from it it doesn't enter the cylinder under primary compresion as the main transfers do....it's still fed from the reeds, like the 2 other boost ports, but at a different angle. You can also see how that feed will be staggered, in this view from the back/inlet.

Inlet, two main boost ports, 3rd boost port/transfer and boyesen feeders
Image

Just for comparison purposes, see the inlet compared to a TS1...and the difference in reed block sizes!
Image

And again, compared to a Cagiva 125 (and these little fuckers kick out 33bhp!) and given the BHP of the cagiva...its inlet port layout seems so much more restrictive than the RB?
Image

You can see on this shot (below) through the exhaust port, that the two main boost ports do in fact line up with the exhaust port quite well......and that the distance is in fact equal between those two ports and the transfers each side...its just the additional 3rd boost/transfer that throws questions and intrigue into the mix.
Image

The reed block.....same as the 225/250, W-layout, same as v-force.....very big reeds, lots of flow.
Image

They match up to the inlet shown below
Image

My only thought on this, is why doesnt the manifold area match the reed area.....can anyone that has tuned/modified these already let me know their thoughts...seems odd?

Open reed area is 7cm
Image

Manifold is 5.5cm ??
Image

Boyesen feeder ports
Image

So....thats the cylinder....a very good piece of kit, nikasil lining looks good, ports look tasty...a few quirky bits that will throw controversy into the mix, and some other bits that can be re-worked here and there to suit people requirements...touring/racing/reliabilty etc.

As for port timings and port area etc....i did a couple of rough port maps....time was against me, so they're as near as damn it in order to get a rough ideas as to what the kit is about and how its tuned as standard...but of course don't take them as gospel to the mm....always measure your own kits etc first before making alts.

RB20 port map
Image

Lined up against a TS1 225 (70mm) port map for comparison purposes
Image

I then put some measurments to the port maps.....

RB
Image

TS1
Image

Note, the port maps were done quite quickly and are a reasonably accurate for compariosn purposes like this, but not guaranteed 100% accurate for important decisions like porting etc!! Measure your own kit first. Also, the TS1 above was completely standard apart from the floor of the inlet being lowered by a couple of mm.

Also from the specs above, you can start to see how well tuned the RB is in standard trim, in comparison to the TS1.....the RB exhaust port is as big as a 225cc TS1! RB transfers are bigger, boost port area is bigger....its all good stuff, and not surprising that rumours of a TS1 beating kit that kicks out 22+ BHP are circulating. The above port maps also give you an idea of how the ports can be tuned for extra power...lower the inlet floor, leave trans and boosts as is, widen exhaust 3mm each side and raise exhasut only 1mm. At -1mm deck height, that would give 136 trans and 194 exhaust with ahealthy port time area...sounds good for a race scoot to me!!! :lol: I think the external exhaust exit may benefit from a fettle also, as on a TS1 it is 36mm (and gets bigger when matches to a JL4 manifold) but the RB is only 34mm....so maybe needs enlarging to help flow the gasses, improve performance and keep everything coool man 8-) 8-)

The last thing worth mentioning is the fact that these kits do of course, marry up to the much more readily available and substantially cheaper small block casings.....pick up any of the 125/150 casings that are kicking about and deemed 2nd rate to a big block casing and you can build a fast engine!! The other bonus is when you inspect the casing transfers on a small block in comparison to a 200cc casing....see below an old Indian GP150 casing that we stripped (ready for the RB! :twisted: )

GP150 Indian
Image

GP200 Indian
Image

From the above shots, its immediately evident that the small block casings have much more meat around the transfers for tuning purposes!! Room for 'finger' boost ports into the casing from the cylinder inlet tract, and loads of meat to scoop out for bigger transfers.

Also, you might naturally think that the big block has bigger transfers as standard....but it doesn't, so even before you tune the small block casings....both physically, and therefore also as a percentage of the bore, the transfers are larger than 200cc transfer...see below:

GP150 @ 26mm on entry to the case
Image

GP200 @ 24mm on entry to the case
Image

Bigger trans....and more meat, just what we want to work with. ;)

So, thats all we have for now...an initial kit inspection....no hard facts about reliabilty or performance....but all the indications are VERY good...no exhaust bridges, 1mm rings on piston....extra boost/transfer port area, boyesen feeders, W-reedblock....rumours of a TS1 beating 22+bhp in standard 'bolt on' trim....with more to come from tuners and racers!! :D :D :D It all looks very exciting, and has great potential....im sure the 3rd boost port/transfer will raise a few eyebrows....as will a couple of other bits n bobs that we're still 'on the fence' on.....but up to now....it all looks very good and i cant wait to get mine built and onto the race track. :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

Over to you...... 8-)
See our YouTube scooter channel for Tech-help: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheScooterFactory/videos
CT.
registered user
Posts: 68
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:58 pm
Location: North Wales
Contact:

Whoo Whoo Waaa Waaa !!!!!!!!!!! :D :D 8-)

This looks like a brilliant piece of kit, quality! What a good idea, it's filling the gap in the market that always existed perfectly..

An alloy/nicasil, reedblock kit with TS1 level performance (+ ?) for the small block... (the excellent but lower capacity Imola aside) it's definitely got my attention anyway and is firmly on my wish-list... no more faffing around changing to 200 casings and losing frame/engine number consistency too..

Excellent write-up by the way Dan, thank you very much for sharing.
User avatar
ArKaTxU
Dealer
Posts: 340
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:26 am
Main scooter: TV175 64-Jet200 68-Jet200 82
Location: Rias Baixas
Contact:

:shock: :shock: looks very good!
User avatar
byron
registered user
Posts: 1226
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 11:45 am
Main scooter: Li Special; scarred,but sound
Location: norwich
Contact:

almost makes me regret recently buying that jet200 casing...
nice review. quality photos. thanks for sharing
User avatar
bazman
registered user
Posts: 578
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:02 am
Playstation gamer tag: bazman70
Location: Annan S.W. Scotland
Contact:

Enjoyed that Dan very informative cheers :) Is the exhaust specifically for the RB or would a ts1 type do?
User avatar
Powolotti
Dealer
Posts: 103
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 2:53 pm
Location: 40 miles north of Vienna
Contact:

brilliant documentation Dan :!:

this boostport thing...dunno :o Can we expect Airsal to have a flowbench where they test prototype cylinders? Or is it just a "here´s too small, add something here" approach?
meet me on Facebook: Michael Powolotti

some of my tuning work:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Powolotti ... 6938811863

my club:
http://www.wiener-spitzbuam.at
User avatar
Powolotti
Dealer
Posts: 103
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 2:53 pm
Location: 40 miles north of Vienna
Contact:

also, if you take away the 3rd small boostport - the main boost arrangement is not symmetrical. Just measured it on the monitor, but even if you add 2mm in width on the secondary transfer and making these two same size it´s not symmetrical. If it works - who cares? :D
meet me on Facebook: Michael Powolotti

some of my tuning work:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Powolotti ... 6938811863

my club:
http://www.wiener-spitzbuam.at
User avatar
drunkmunkey6969
Moderator
Posts: 2838
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:42 pm
Main scooter: '69 Lambretta GP
Location: North Yorkshire
Contact:

Powolotti wrote: If it works - who cares? :D
I think that is a key phrase! :lol:

Certainly this may seem to contradict what people believe to be correct....but as you say....If it works - who cares?
See our YouTube scooter channel for Tech-help: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheScooterFactory/videos
User avatar
gnasher
registered user
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:20 pm
Location: gloucestershire
Contact:

Superb write up Dan. Do you do technical writes ups for a living cause they always make good reading. I`ve got a request mate, I dont suppose you could measure the pipe you`re using. Overall length and then outside diameters every 25mm should be enough to produce a drawing on my cad, I`ll then post it for disscusion and possible improvements, you might also eventualy want an OTT version made from scratch ;)

HTH gnasher
davidblythe
registered user
Posts: 298
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 7:19 pm
Location: Cheam, Surrey
Contact:

that report was very informative, would love to see this standard of analysis in all mainstream bike magazines
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic
  • Information
  • Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 13 guests