Page 4 of 5

Re: Cyclone 5

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 8:54 pm
by Timbo
I thought all of batch 2 had been recalled?

Re: Cyclone 5

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:59 pm
by RAP 200
Not all of them as far as i am aware, the one i have has been faultless , its the upgraded on that has failed .

Re: Cyclone 5

Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 9:35 am
by mikeallen
This isn't making good reading as I've just finished installing my cyclone box into my motor and I'm now concerned about its reliability :(

I believe mine is the version 2 after the recall ( is there any way of checking this that the cluster is the newer version :?: ) but it seems these are now prone to failure going by the original post and as mentioned earlier are being upgraded with a 3rd verion :?

In two minds now whether to go with it or strip it back down and revert back to my reliable innocenti 4 speed box as intended, as the thought of it sheering teeth or locking up at speed is not filling me with any confidence in it :(

Re: Cyclone 5

Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 10:18 am
by jonashford
I'll gladly give u £200 for it for my spare rb engine :-)))

Re: Cyclone 5

Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 3:48 pm
by weedodger
how can you tell if its version 2 or 3 ff sakes.i just bought mine 3 weeks ago off Martin . :?:

Re: Cyclone 5

Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 4:34 pm
by thesx200
Look at the serial numbers on the cluster , it should tell you on there , i contacted Dean to confirm mine was from the correct version.

Re: Cyclone 5

Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 6:46 pm
by wack 63
Have a look at the Cyclone link in What's going on in the Scootererotica Garage, there is a pic of the cluster numbers

Re: Cyclone 5

Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 9:05 pm
by weedodger
408 G13 5S Is mine?

Re: Cyclone 5

Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 9:19 pm
by rosscla
That looks to be the same as the one on the thread mentioned.

Re: Cyclone 5

Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 9:44 pm
by soullad
RAP 200 wrote:Not all of them as far as i am aware, the one i have has been faultless , its the upgraded on that has failed .
are you saying this was a batch 3 cluster that failed ?