I thought the Scootering response from " a professional" was not helpful either and very one sided, and of course they will always tend to side with their chosen profession.
Compass
I thought the Scootering response from " a professional" was not helpful either and very one sided, and of course they will always tend to side with their chosen profession.
compass wrote:I thought the Scootering response from " a professional" was not helpful either and very one sided, and of course they will always tend to side with their chosen profession.
Compass
I wasn't implying that Scootering was being one sided, I thought that asking an insurance companies viewpoint was a good idea, however their view will always be a little biased in my opinion.drunkmunkey6969 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2017 8:31 amcompass wrote:I thought the Scootering response from " a professional" was not helpful either and very one sided, and of course they will always tend to side with their chosen profession.
Compass
An unusual viewpoint you have there? The situation is not actually as you describe at all, we are not involved in the matter and therefore there are no 'sides' for us to take.
It's a simple case of us printing a readers letter, asking an insurance company for a response to the scenario, and reporting the situation to the reader. We have no say in the matter, or 'side' to take.
If printing the letter/response stimulates debate, as it appears from this thread that it has, then that's a good thing. If the letter also encourages people to check their policies for strict clauses they may previously have been unaware of, then that's a good thing too.
Readers can then make informed choices about which insurance companies they do business with, and what clauses they find acceptable. That's all there is to it really....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk