Keeping the revolving 'mass' and inertia the same thenRich_T wrote:If I were going to put dead inertial mass anywhere in a bottom end it would be in the crank webs where the extra width could be used more positively to retain the crank pin and counter balance the moving parts without a huge torque load going through the mag side taper.
(Sorry this post is for the hard of understanding defence league)
So variators a) weigh less, b) have a cush in terms of the pulley/belt etc. c) have an rpm progressive clutch: therefore do not suffer these probs?
The crank/flywheel taper is to ensure alignment at the same time as adhesion.
So the solution is a splined flywheel fitment that ensures ignition system alignment? Or an ignition system that is not so sensitive to alignment...eg external?
Sorry for this 'Blurt', curious tho....